SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v M’Thiringi M’Anmpiu & another v District Land Adjudication Officer & Settlement Officer Tigania East & another; Peter Miriti M’Lingera & 4 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 3314 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3314 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3314
Citation
[2021] KEELC 3314 (KLR)
Decided
12 May 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for reinstatement, revival, and substitution of applicant
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs to the interested parties

Facts

The applicants sought orders for reinstatement of a dismissed suit, revival of granted orders, and substitution of the first applicant with the administrator of the estate of the deceased applicant. The application was based on the applicants' claim that they were misinformed by their advocate and that the delay in prosecuting the matter was inadvertent.

Issues

  1. Whether the application for reinstatement, revival, and substitution of the applicant is valid
  2. Whether the suit was ever filed as directed by the court on 22.2.2017

Reasoning

The court found that no substantive motion was ever filed, and no further action was taken on the file. The court also cited the case of Mary Kiunga Ikiome v H Young Company Ltd [2019] eKLR, stating that there was no suit pending and that the provisions of Article 50 and 159 of the Constitution cannot salvage the situation.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application for reinstatement, revival, and substitution of the applicant is dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Judicial Review Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Mary Kiunga Ikiome v H Young Company Ltd [2019] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case