SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Phyllis Makokha Sundia (Suing as the Legal Representative of Lucas Sundia Muga) v Francis Tobias Okello [2021] KEELC 3574 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3574 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3574
Citation
[2021] KEELC 3574 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for determination of a suit to be struck outCoramA. OMOLLO
The application is allowed with the result that this suit is struck out with costs of the suit and the application awarded to the Defendant/Applicant

Facts

The Plaintiff/Respondent is the mother of Gabriel Onyanchi, who is the legal representative of the estate of Lucas Sundia Muga. Gabriel Onyanchi was sued in ELC No. 44 of 2015 for eviction orders from the Suit Land. The Respondent claims that Gabriel Onyanchi was not acting on her behalf.

Issues

  • Whether the suit is res judicata
  • Whether the Respondent can represent the estate of Lucas Sundia Muga-deceased

Reasoning

The matter in issue is identical in both suits, the parties are the same, the title/claim is the same, there is concurrence of jurisdiction, and the previous decision was final. The previous suit was on behalf of the deceased estate just like the present one.

Outcome

Struck out

Orders

  • This Suit be struck out

Remedies

  • Costs of the suit and the application awarded to the Defendant/Applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21
Cases cited (1)
  • Bernard Mugo Ndegwa Vs James Nderitu Githae and 2 Others (2010) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case