SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elizabeth Ntinyari v Joyce Kaburo Rauga (being a trustee of Judy Rauga Gichu, Edward Mbaya Rauga, Ronald Muriithi Rauga and Nicholas Mutwiri Rauga) [2021] KEELC 3667 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3667 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3667
Citation
[2021] KEELC 3667 (KLR)
Decided
21 April 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdverse PossessionPosturePlaintiff's claim for adverse possession of landCoramHON. LUCY. N. MBUGUA, C/A: Kananu, Gatari Ringera for plaintiff
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff has proofed her case on a balance of probabilities and declares that the plaintiff is entitled to the suit land parcel NYAKI/GIAKI/KIBURINE/12 by way of adverse possession.

Facts

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Ntinyari, claims continuous and peaceful possession of land parcel NYAKI/GIAKI/KIBURINE/12 since 1974. She has established her home there and developed the land with permanent and semi-permanent buildings.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff has acquired title to the suit land by way of adverse possession

Reasoning

The court follows the legal definition of adverse possession as described in Mtana Lewa v Kahindi Ngala Mwagandi [2015] eKLR, where possession must be continuous, peaceful, and without the owner's consent for 12 years.

Outcome

Plaintiff is entitled to the suit land parcel NYAKI/GIAKI/KIBURINE/12 by way of adverse possession.

Orders

  • The defendant is directed to execute the necessary documents to effect the suit land into the name of the plaintiff.
  • In default, the Deputy Registrar of this court is authorized to sign such documents.

Remedies

  • Granting of title to the plaintiff

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Mtana Lewa v Kahindi Ngala Mwagandi [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case