SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Transmatresses Limited v County Government of Kisumu [2021] KEELC 3825 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3825 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3825
Citation
[2021] KEELC 3825 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand Ownership DisputePostureAppeal from a preliminary objectionCoramANTONY OMBWAYO
The Preliminary Objection is dismissed with costs as the issue of ownership has been determined by the court, and the Plaintiff is seeking an injunction based on a new notice which has not been previously adjudicated.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Transmatresses Limited, claims to be the lawful owner of a parcel of land known as Kisumu Municipality/Block 9/24. The Plaintiff previously sued the County Government of Kisumu in 2011, where the court declared her as the lawful owner and issued an injunction. The current suit is based on a notice dated 9/12/2020.

Issues

  • Whether the current suit is res judicata
  • Whether the Plaintiff is seeking a determination on ownership or an injunction based on a new notice

Reasoning

The court found that the parties and subject matter are the same, but the Plaintiff's new cause of action regarding the notice dated 9/12/2020 has not been previously adjudicated, thus the Preliminary Objection is dismissed.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Preliminary Objection dismissed with costs

Remedies

  • Injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Environment Court Act
Cases cited (5)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Ltd –v- West End Distributors Ltd
  • Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission –v- Maina Kiai & 5 Others
  • E.T.V –v- Attorney General & Another
  • Gurbachau –v- Yowani Ekori
  • Henderson –v- Henderson
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case