SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ruth Wanjeri Kamwere & anotherv Vincent Nyingi Nderitu [2021] KEELC 3986 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3986 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
3986
Citation
[2021] KEELC 3986 (KLR)
Decided
18 March 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeContempt of CourtPostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramY.M. ANGIMA
Holding

The court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove the contempt of court charges against the Plaintiffs.

Facts

The Plaintiffs and their sons were accused of cutting down trees on a parcel of land and transporting them in lorries, allegedly in violation of a court order.

Issues

  1. Whether the Defendant has proved the contempt alleged against the Plaintiffs.
  2. Whether the OCS Njabini Police Station and OCPD Kinangop Division should be directed to supervise enforcement of the status quo order.
  3. Whether the suit should be set down for hearing on priority basis.

Reasoning

The court held that the Defendant did not provide credible evidence linking the Plaintiffs to the logging activities and that the standard of proof required for contempt of court is higher than proof on the balance of probabilities.

Outcome

The suit is certified fit for hearing on priority basis.

Orders

  • The suit is set down for hearing on priority basis.
  • The costs of the application are to be in the case.
  • The proceedings are to be typed within 30 days.

Remedies

  • The Plaintiffs are not found guilty of contempt of court.
  • The OCS Njabini Police Station and OCPD Kinangop Division are not directed to supervise enforcement of the status quo order.
  • The suit is set down for hearing on priority basis.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap.21)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case