SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chief Land Registrar, Registrar of Titles & Attorney General;Thika Wax Works Limited (Interested Party) Ex Parte;Block Seven Developers Limited (Environment and Land Judicial Review Case 17 of 2017) [2021] KEELC 4316 (KLR) (Environment and Land) (4 February 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEELC 4316 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4316
Citation
[2021] KEELC 4316 (KLR)
Decided
4 February 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for stay of execution of judgmentCoramS. Okongo
The stay of execution is granted for 24 months or until the appeal is heard and determined, with a deposit of Kshs. 500,000 as security.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant won a judgment on May 5, 2020, which included orders to quash a decision to cancel the transfer of a property and to issue a provisional certificate of title. The interested party appealed the judgment and sought a stay of execution pending the appeal.

Issues

  • Whether to grant a stay of execution of the judgment
  • What security to require for the stay

Reasoning

The court found merit in the application due to the substantial loss the applicant would suffer if the orders were not stayed and the lack of security offered.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution is granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution for 24 months or until appeal is heard and determined
  • Security deposit of Kshs. 500,000 in an interest-earning bank account

Remedies

  • Stay of execution
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case