SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Benedict Obat & 3 others v Pius Onyango Obat [2021] KEELC 4354 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4354 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4354
Citation
[2021] KEELC 4354 (KLR)
Decided
11 February 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of a Resident MagistrateCoramANTONY OMBWAYO
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and a stay of execution of the decree on Ukwala ELC No. 70 of 2018 is granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal. An order of temporary injunction is also granted.

Facts

The appellants (Benedict Obat, Lawrence Oloo Udony, Jacob Ogost Talo, and Peter Oduor Wandei) appealed against a judgment of the Hon. C.N. Sindani Senior Resident Magistrate in Ukwala ELC No. 70 of 2018, which awarded the respondent (Pius Onyango Obat) sole proprietorship of Land Title No. UHOLO/MAGOYA/221 and costs of the suit. The appellants sought a stay of execution of the decree and a temporary injunction.

Issues

  1. Res judicata
  2. jurisdiction of the trial court
  3. delay in filing the application for stay pending appeal
  4. ownership of the suit land

Reasoning

The court found that the appeal was lodged on time and there was no unreasonable delay in filing the application for stay pending appeal. The court also found that there is a deposit of Kshs. 7,550,000 in the names of the lawyers representing the parties, which serves as security.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Stay of execution of decree on Ukwala ELC No. 70 of 2018 pending hearing and determination of the appeal
  • Order of temporary injunction pending hearing and determination of appeal

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of decree
  • Temporary injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case