Samuel Musingila Mwinzi v Esther Maasa Kaesa (On behalf of the Estate of Kaesa Kiiti) [2021] KEELC 4356 (KLR)
- Court
- Environment & Land Court
- Case number
- 4356
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 4356 (KLR)
Summary at a glance
TypeAppealPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks to set aside the Judgment of the court and have the Appeal heard de novo.CoramO.A. ANGOTE
The Judgment of the court delivered on 1st November, 2019 is set aside.
Facts
Respondent/Applicant failed to file the Record of Appeal and serve the Appellant’s submissions within the court’s orders. The Appellant’s advocate misled the court by not serving the Respondent’s advocate with the Appellant’s submissions.
Issues
- Whether the Respondent/Applicant had a legitimate expectation to be served with the Appellant’s submissions.
- Whether the Appellant’s advocate’s failure to serve the Respondent’s advocate with the Appellant’s submissions is a sufficient ground to set aside the Judgment.
Reasoning
The Appellant’s advocate did not serve the Respondent’s advocate with the Appellant’s submissions as ordered by the court, and the Respondent was condemned unheard.
Outcome
The Judgment and Decree of the court delivered on 1st November, 2019, and all the subsequent orders, are set aside.
Orders
- The Appeal will be heard and determined by the Environment and Land Court Judge sitting in Makueni.
- The Appellant’s advocates’ law firm to personally pay to the Respondent the costs of this Application.
Remedies
- The Judgment and Decree of the court delivered on 1st November, 2019, and all the subsequent orders, are set aside.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…