SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyangenya Isaboke Maniga (Suing through his Attorney Joel Maniga) v Andrew M I Ochoki; Baraka Maternity & Nursing Home Ltd (Interested Party) [2021] KEELC 4425 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4425 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4425
Citation
[2021] KEELC 4425 (KLR)
Decided
11 February 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an original trial judgmentCoramLaw
Holding

The warrant of attachment is set aside in part, and the plaintiff is restrained from charging interest for the period he pursued the appeal.

Facts

Baraka Maternity & Nursing Home Ltd applied to set aside a warrant of attachment issued against it by the plaintiff, claiming the assets were not its own but those of the defendant, Andrew M I Ochoki. The plaintiff opposed the application, asserting the attachment was valid.

Issues

  1. Set aside the warrant of attachment issued against Baraka Maternity & Nursing Home Ltd
  2. Order for stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing of the application

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant company was an incorporated entity operating a maternity and nursing home, and its assets were not subject to attachment in execution of a decree against the defendant in his personal name.

Outcome

The application is granted in part, and the plaintiff is restrained from charging interest.

Orders

  • Set aside the warrant of attachment against Baraka Maternity & Nursing Home Ltd
  • Order for stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing of the application

Remedies

  • Restraint on charging interest for the period of appeal

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case