SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Anna Seyenzia Itanyukhu Indeche v Tom Makokha Musambai [2021] KEELC 4708 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4708 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4708
Citation
[2021] KEELC 4708 (KLR)
Decided
18 January 2021
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLand DisputePostureAppeal from a previous judgmentCoramBoaz N. Olao
The plaintiff's suit is struck out, the defendant's counter-claim is struck out, the eviction order is declared null and void, and each party bears their own costs.

Facts

The plaintiff claimed adverse possession of a land parcel, but the court found the land parcel had been sub-divided and the suit was res judicata.

Issues

  • Whether the plaintiff has been in continuous possession for 12 years.
  • Whether the defendant's father's title was extinguished.
  • Whether the defendant's father was the person through whom the defendant claimed.
  • Whether the defendant's title was subject to the plaintiff's interest.
  • Whether the plaintiff has become entitled by adverse possession.

Reasoning

The land parcel had been sub-divided, making the plaintiff's claim to the original parcel impossible. The court declared the eviction order null and void.

Outcome

The plaintiff's suit is dismissed, the defendant's counter-claim is dismissed, and the eviction order is nullified.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit is struck out.
  • The defendant's Counter-Claim is struck out.
  • The eviction order dated 1st August 2002 is declared null and void and expunged from the record.

Remedies

  • Costs are to be borne by each party.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Registered Land Act CAP 300 LAWS OF KENYA
  • Cap 22 Laws of Kenya
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case