SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Haji & another v Moorhead; Kenya Wildlife Services (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 74 of 2019) [2021] KEELC 4787 (KLR) (31 August 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEELC 4787 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
4787
Citation
[2021] KEELC 4787 (KLR)
Decided
31 August 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for Injunction and Leave to File DefenceCoramJO OLOLA
Holding

The court allows the application to grant KWS leave to be a second defendant and enjoins it from entering, remaining in, constructing, selling or dealing with the suit property.

Facts

Haji and Famau filed a suit against Moorhead alleging trespassing and construction on LR No. 27898 Lamu. Moorhead claimed authority and license from Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) to operate a tourist recreational facility on Kiwayu Island.

Issues

  1. Whether KWS is a necessary party to the proceedings
  2. Validity of KWS's claim to the land

Reasoning

The court finds that KWS's claim to the land is valid and necessary to be heard, as it is a party with a stake in the proceedings and will be affected by the court's decision.

Outcome

KWS is granted leave to be a second defendant and enjoined from entering, remaining in, constructing, selling or dealing with the suit property.

Orders

  • KWS granted leave to be a second defendant
  • KWS enjoined from entering, remaining in, constructing, selling or dealing with the suit property

Remedies

  • Injunction against KWS

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Legal Notice No. 291 of 26th October 1979
Cases cited (3)
  • Black's Law Dictionary
  • Communications Commission of Kenya & 4 others – vs- Royal Media Services Ltd & 7 others [2014] eKLR
  • Mumo Matemo case
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case