SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Diba Hussein Dado v Mohamed Noor [2021] KEELC 569 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 569 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
569
Citation
[2021] KEELC 569 (KLR)
Decided
22 November 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand DisputePostureApplication for Temporary InjunctionCoramHON. JUSTICE P M NJOROGE, COURT ASSISTANT – BALOZI
Holding

The Honourable Court granted the Plaintiff's application for temporary injunctions restraining the Defendants from entering, trespassing, and interfering with the Plaintiff's enjoyment, use, and possession of the land parcel ISIOLO TOWNSHIP BLOCK 1/159.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Diba Hussein Dado, claims to be the legally registered owner of land parcel ISIOLO TOWNSHIP BLOCK 1/159, purchased in 2013 from Moses Kirimi Mbogori. The Defendant, Mohamed Noor, trespassed onto the land in 2019 and began claiming ownership. The Plaintiff lodged a complaint with CID, and the Defendants were arrested and charged with forcible detainer. Despite the charges, the Defendants continued trespassing and selling portions of the land.

Issues

  1. Ownership of the land parcel ISIOLO TOWNSHIP BLOCK 1/159
  2. Right to peaceful and quiet use and occupation of the land

Reasoning

The Plaintiff has a prima facie case with high chances of success, and the balance of convenience tilts in favor of the Plaintiff. The Defendants' actions are in gross violation of the Plaintiff's right to ownership of private property.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • Temporary injunction restraining the Defendants from entering, trespassing, and interfering with the Plaintiff's enjoyment, use, and possession of the land parcel ISIOLO TOWNSHIP BLOCK 1/159

Remedies

  • Costs to be provided for

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Article 40 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case