SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Godfrey Simiyu Mujuma & 3 others v Kenya National Highways Authority & 2 others [2021] KEELC 726 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 726 (KLR) Environment & Land Court
Read PDF
Court
Environment & Land Court
Case number
726
Citation
[2021] KEELC 726 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision to dismiss a preliminary objection and grant costs to the defendant.CoramHON. JUSTICE L.L. NAIKUNI
Holding

The court allowed the preliminary objection and granted costs to the defendant.

Facts

The plaintiffs/applicants filed a suit against the defendants, seeking costs after withdrawing the suit. The defendant argued that the plaintiffs/applicants had not complied with a mandatory procedure under the Kenya Roads Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the filed preliminary objection by the 1st Defendant/Respondent meets the known and established threshold of a preliminary objection.
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs/Applicants are entitled to be granted the orders of Costs against the 1st Defendant/Respondent after withdrawing their application and the entire suit against the Defendants.

Reasoning

The court held that the plaintiffs/applicants had not fully complied with the mandatory procedure under the Kenya Roads Act, rendering their suit fatally defective.

Outcome

The plaintiffs/applicants' suit was dismissed, and costs were awarded to the defendant.

Orders

  • The notice of motion application and the suit were marked as settled and withdrawn.
  • The preliminary objection by the 1st Defendant/Respondent was allowed as prayed.
  • Each party to their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Kenya Roads Act, 2007
  • Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  • Order 25 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
  • Attorney General & Another v Andrew Mwaura Githinji & another
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case