SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

BONIFACE KIRWERE NJOGU V DISTRICT LAND DISPUTE TRIBUNAL & 2 OTHERS [2013] KEELRC 316 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 316 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
316
Citation
[2013] KEELRC 316 (KLR)
Decided
29 April 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application to quash award and decreeCoramB.N. OLAO
Holding

The ex-parte applicant's application is granted. The Kirinyaga South District Land Dispute Tribunal acted ultra vires and its award is null and void. The decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court is also quashed.

Facts

The ex-parte applicant is the registered owner of land parcel MWEA/TEBERE/B/1297. The Kirinyaga South District Land Dispute Tribunal awarded the land to the applicant's brother, who was the 3rd respondent. The ex-parte applicant sought to quash the award and decree.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Land Dispute Tribunal
  2. Ownership of land parcel MWEA/TEBERE/B/1297

Reasoning

The Land Dispute Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine the ownership of land. The High Court has previously ruled that Land Dispute Tribunals have no jurisdiction over title disputes.

Outcome

The ex-parte applicant's application is granted.

Orders

  • The award of the Kirinyaga South District Land Dispute Tribunal and the decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court are quashed.
  • Each party bears their own costs.

Remedies

  • Quashing of award and decree

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Land Disputes Tribunal Act No. 18 of 1990
  • Registered Land Act
  • Land Registration Act
Cases cited (3)
  • WAMWEA VS CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF MURANGA 2003 K.L.R. 389
  • GICHINGIRI VS GICHINGIRI H.C. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2009 (NYERI)
  • KANGI VS NJOGU H.C. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2007 (NYERI)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case