SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Provincial Appeals Commttee & 6 others Ex-Parte Peter Gatimu Kanyonyo [2014] KEHC 7072 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 7072 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7072
Citation
[2014] KEHC 7072 (KLR)
Decided
17 February 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx-parte application for quashing a decision of the Provincial Appeals CommitteeCoramB.N. Olao
Holding

The Provincial Appeals Committee's decision is quashed as it acted ultra vires and the award is a nullity.

Facts

The applicant, Peter Gatimu Kanyonyo, sought to quash the Provincial Appeals Committee's decision in Wanguru Senior Resident Magistrate's Court Arbitration Case No. 9 of 2009, which awarded land parcels MUTIRA/KIAGA/1672, 1673, and 1677 to the applicant's children.

Issues

  1. Provincial Appeals Committee's jurisdiction to hear a dispute involving title to land
  2. Validity of the award made by the Kirinyaga South District Land Tribunal

Reasoning

The Court held that the Land Dispute Tribunal Act does not give the Tribunal the power to determine a dispute involving title to land. The Court also noted that the award was made by a Tribunal that had no jurisdiction to hear the dispute.

Outcome

The Provincial Appeals Committee's decision is quashed.

Orders

  • Quash the decision of the Provincial Appeals Committee

Remedies

  • The parties are encouraged to find an amicable settlement

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Land Dispute Tribunal Act 1990
  • Registered Land Act
Cases cited (1)
  • JOTHAM AMUNAVI VS THE CHAIRMAN SABATIA DIVISIONAL LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL & ANOTHER C.A NO. 256 of 2002
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case