SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Leonard Gethoi Kamweti v National Bank of Kenya Limited & 2 others [2015] KEELRC 1603 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1603 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1603
Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1603 (KLR)
Decided
7 May 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAmendment to PleadingsPostureApplication for leave to amend pleadingsCoramHON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
Holding

The court allows the application to amend the claim, but the introduction of certain evidence will not be introduced in the amendment.

Facts

The applicant seeks to amend his claim to remove two directors of the respondent and introduce articles on labor rights, which were excluded in the original claim. The respondents oppose the amendment, citing that the amended claim was already filed and served on them.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend his pleadings
  2. Whether the introduction of constitutional provisions will aid the court in analyzing the case

Reasoning

The court grants the application as it falls under the jurisdiction of the Industrial Court Act and the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules. The court finds that the amendment will not cause injury to the opposite party and that the introduction of constitutional provisions will aid the court in analyzing the case.

Outcome

The application is allowed, and the amendment will be done within 7 days from the date of the judgment.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to amend his pleadings
  • The introduction of certain evidence will not be introduced in the amendment

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Industrial Court Act
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Cold Storage (1964) Limited vs Overseas Food Services (Africa) Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case