SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Scientific Research International,Technical & Institutions Workers Union v M-Care Limited [2016] KEELRC 1065 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1065 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1065
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1065 (KLR)
Decided
17 June 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramAbuodha Jorum Nelson
Holding

The Employment and Labour Relations Court finds that the claimant has the legal authority to file the trade dispute and overrules the respondent's objection.

Facts

The claimant, Kenya Scientific Research International, Technical & Institutions Workers Union, filed a trade dispute against the respondent, M-Care Limited, alleging that the respondent lacked the legal authority to be represented by the claimant due to the absence of a collective bargaining agreement or a recognition agreement.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimant has the legal authority to file a trade dispute against the respondent
  2. Whether the respondent's submission on locus standi is valid

Reasoning

The court ruled that the claimant has the legal authority to file the trade dispute as it is regulated by the Labour Relations Act, which defines a recognition agreement and a collective bargaining agreement. The court also noted that union officials have the right of audience before the court, similar to advocates.

Outcome

The objection is overruled.

Orders

  • The claimant's trade dispute is allowed to proceed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Communication Workers' Union vs. Safaricom Ltd
  • Kenya Union of Employees of Voluntary and Charitable Organizations v. BOG Maina Wanjigi Secondary School
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case