SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lydia Temko Nandemu v Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology [2016] KEELRC 143 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 143 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
143
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 143 (KLR)
Decided
3 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from an original trialCoramHon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango
Holding

The court held that the applicant is entitled to the orders lifting the suspension as the suspension period of 21 days has lapsed without any investigations or disciplinary process concluding.

Facts

The applicant, Lydia Temko Nandemu, was suspended from duty by the Respondent, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, on August 17, 2016, for misconduct. The suspension was for half pay and was intended to facilitate investigations. The applicant was informed that investigations had concluded on August 23, 2016, and was required to show cause for disciplinary action.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to orders lifting the suspension

Reasoning

The court ruled that the suspension cannot exceed 21 days except in specific circumstances, none of which apply in this case. The court found that the applicant is entitled to reinstatement as the 21-day period has expired without any investigations or disciplinary process concluding.

Outcome

The court granted the applicant's application to lift the suspension and compel the Respondent to resume payment of full monthly salary.

Orders

  • Order to lift suspension
  • Order to resume payment of full monthly salary

Remedies

  • Lifting of suspension
  • Compulsory payment of full monthly salary

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case