SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Michael Njoroge v Barclays Bank Ltd & another [2016] KEELRC 1585 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1585 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1585
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1585 (KLR)
Decided
11 March 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from a preliminary objectionCoramRadido Stephen
Holding

The Court dismisses the objection by the Hon. Attorney General.

Facts

The Claimant filed a cause of action against the Respondents for damages for malicious prosecution and special damages for advocates' costs incurred during the criminal trial of the Claimant. The Hon. Attorney General filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection disputing the Court's jurisdiction to entertain the aspect of the Claimant's cause of action.

Issues

  1. Court's jurisdiction to entertain the aspect of the Claimant's cause of action relating to damages for malicious prosecution and special damages for advocates' costs incurred during the criminal trial of the Claimant.
  2. Filing of objections in Causes and keeping them in abeyance without prosecution

Reasoning

The filing of objections in Causes and keeping them in abeyance without prosecution is antithetical to the objective of the establishment of this Court to ensure expeditious determination of disputes. Employment disputes by their nature should not be in the Court’s docket for nearly a year, and more so preliminary objections.

Outcome

The objection by the Hon. Attorney General is dismissed.

Orders

  • The parties are directed to file witness statements, any further documents and agreed issues before 1 April 2016, to enable the Cause to be fixed for hearing on the merits.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case