SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Abednego Reuben Okarikodi Etyang’a v Attorney General & 4 others [2016] KEELRC 1726 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1726 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1726
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1726 (KLR)
Decided
5 February 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureClaimant seeks interim orders for reinstatement and salary reinstatement, Respondents seek review of ordersCoramMATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
Holding

Court finds application for review lacks merit, grants interim orders for reinstatement and salary reinstatement

Facts

Claimant was redeployed from Ministry of Interior to Ministry of Agriculture, his salary was frozen, and he filed for interim orders and review of orders

Issues

  1. whether respondents are in wilful defiance of court orders
  2. whether claimant satisfied requirements for temporary mandatory injunction
  3. whether respondents satisfied requirements for review of orders

Reasoning

Court finds respondents in wilful defiance, grants interim orders for reinstatement and salary reinstatement

Outcome

Claimant's application for review of orders is dismissed, interim orders granted

Orders

  • Reinstatement of claimant's pay from date of redeployment until further orders
  • Restraint on respondents from interfering with claimant's employment in public service in job group R pending hearing and determination of suit
  • Claimant continues to provide service in whatever capacity he will be deployed pending hearing and determination of suit

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of claimant's pay
  • Restraint on respondents from interfering with claimant's employment
  • Claimant continues to provide service
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case