SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Transport Workers Union v Puma Wholesalers Limited [2016] KEELRC 1828 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 1828 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1828
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 1828 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureRespondent/Applicant seeks to file a notice of appeal out of time against a ruling dismissing an application for reviewCoramMATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
The application to enlarge time within which the applicant is to file a notice of appeal is misconceived, and the application for stay of execution pending filing of appeal to the Court of Appeal is refused.

Facts

The respondent/applicant sought to file an appeal out of time against a judgment dismissing an application for review, citing a delay due to lack of knowledge of their advocates.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent/applicant can file a notice of appeal out of time
  • Whether the respondent/applicant can seek a stay of execution of the judgment

Reasoning

The application to enlarge time was misconceived as the notice of appeal was already filed without leave of court. The judgment was delivered eleven months before the application was filed, and the applicant squandered the opportunity to appeal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed, application for stay of execution refused

Orders

  • Application to enlarge time for filing a notice of appeal is refused
  • Application for stay of execution pending filing of appeal to the Court of Appeal is refused
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case