SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jonesmas Thoya Mukamba v Crest Security Services Limited [2016] KEELRC 267 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 267 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
267
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 267 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePremature Termination of EmploymentPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramO.N. MAKAU
Holding

The termination of the Claimant's employment by the Respondent was unfair and unjust.

Facts

The Claimant, Jonesmas Thoya Mukamba, was employed by the Respondent, Crest Security Services Limited, as a Night Guard under a fixed term contract. The contract was terminated prematurely on 7.8.2015 for gross misconduct. The Claimant denied the allegations and sought compensation and terminal dues.

Issues

  1. Whether the premature termination of the Claimant's contract was unfair.
  2. Whether the reliefs sought by the Claimant should be granted.

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent did not prove valid and fair procedure, and thus the termination was unfair. The Court awarded one month salary in lieu of notice, eight months' salary as compensation for the unfair termination, and a sum of Kshs. 290,151.

Outcome

Judgment entered for the Claimant, declaring his termination unfair and awarding him the sum of Kshs. 290,151 plus costs and interest.

Orders

  • Award of one month salary in lieu of notice
  • Award of eight months' salary as compensation for the unfair termination
  • Judgment declaring the termination unfair

Remedies

  • One month salary in lieu of notice
  • Eight months' salary as compensation for the unfair termination
  • Judgment declaring the termination unfair

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act
  • Wage Order for May 2015
  • Regulation 17 Regulation of Wages (protective security services) Order
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case