SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wilfred Onserio Metobo v Wilfred Onserio Metobo & another [2016] KEELRC 470 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 470 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
470
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 470 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureMotion for Temporary and Mandatory InjunctionCoramHon. Lady Justice Maureen Onyango
The motion for temporary and mandatory injunction is granted.

Facts

The applicant, Wilfred Onserio Metobo, was accused of soliciting bribes and receiving money under false pretenses. He was issued show cause letters and later an interdiction letter, leading to disciplinary proceedings.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant's rights under the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and Employment Act have been violated.
  • Whether the disciplinary process against the applicant was procedurally fair and just.

Reasoning

The court found that the disciplinary process was not procedurally fair and that the applicant's rights were violated.

Outcome

The motion for temporary and mandatory injunction is granted.

Orders

  • Certified as urgent.
  • Issued a temporary injunction against the respondents from proceeding with the disciplinary process.
  • Issued a mandatory injunction to re-instate the applicant to his position on full pay and allowances.
  • Issued a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from proceeding with any disciplinary process based on unsubstantiated allegations.

Remedies

  • Reinstatement to position on full pay and allowances.
  • Prohibition of further disciplinary actions based on unsubstantiated allegations.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case