SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dennis Mutua Simon & 9 others v Insight Management Consultants Limited [2016] KEELRC 511 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 511 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
511
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 511 (KLR)
Decided
14 October 2016
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeIndustrial DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJames Rika
Termination was based on valid ground but lacking in fairness of procedure. The Respondent shall pay the Claimants the total amount of Kshs. 658,430 in compensation and terminal dues.

Facts

Claimants were employed as Helpers by Respondent and sought wage increment. They went on a wildcat strike on 19th September 2013 demanding immediate implementation of the wage increment announced by the Government. The Respondent terminated their contracts of employment.

Issues

  • Validity of termination
  • Fairness of procedure
  • Compensation for unfair termination

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimants involved in an illegal strike and the Respondent had valid reason to terminate their contracts of employment. The procedure leading to termination was flawed.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • Payment of Kshs. 658,430 to the Claimants in compensation and terminal dues
  • Interest granted at 14% p.a if not paid within 30 days
  • Certificates of Service released to the Claimants
  • No order on the costs

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination
  • Salary in lieu of notice
  • Underpayments
  • Annual leave pay
  • Work done in September 2013

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Labour Relations Act 2007
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case