SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Kipchirchir Sambu v Patriotic Guards Limited [2016] KEELRC 53 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 53 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
53
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 53 (KLR)
Decided
13 October 2016
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureRespondent seeks stay of execution of judgment and ruling pending appealCoramM. MBARU
The application is allowed with certain conditions

Facts

Claimant James Kipchirchir Sambu filed an application seeking a stay of execution of the judgment and ruling of the court, arguing that the appeal is arguable with high chances of success and that the orders should be stayed to avoid injustice and hardship.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent has a right to appeal the judgment and ruling
  • Whether there will be substantial loss to the respondent if the stay is not granted

Reasoning

The court distinguished between substantial loss and irreparable loss, and held that the respondent did not demonstrate substantial loss. The court granted a deposit of the entire decretal sum as security pending the hearing of the appeal.

Outcome

The application is allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Deposit of the entire decretal sum in a joint, interest-earning account within 14 days
  • Orders apply pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  • If the respondent fails to move the court within 60 days, orders will automatically lapse

Remedies

  • Costs to the claimant

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Kenya Shell Limited Versus Kibiru
  • Socfinac Co. Ltd versus Nelphat Kimotho Muturi
  • Machira t/a Machira & Co. Advocates versus East African Standard
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case