SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Commercial Food And Allied Workers v Kenya National Library Service [2016] KEELRC 533 (KLR)

[2016] KEELRC 533 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
533
Citation
[2016] KEELRC 533 (KLR)
Decided
19 July 2016
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeLabour DisputePostureClaimant seeks specific performance of Collective Bargaining AgreementCoramM. MBARU
The court orders the Respondent to fully implement the CBA 2010-2012 and pay outstanding amounts of Kshs.66,347,316.10

Facts

The Respondent failed to fully implement a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) registered as RCA No. 293 of 2013, resulting in arrears of Kshs.66 million for the period 2012 to June 2014.

Issues

  • Failure to fully implement CBA
  • Arrears payment

Reasoning

The Labour Relations Act mandates the implementation of CBA and failure to do so allows for specific performance. The court registered the CBA, making it enforceable and binding on both parties.

Outcome

Claimant wins specific performance of CBA

Orders

  • Respondent to fully implement CBA 2010-2012 and pay outstanding amounts

Remedies

  • Specific performance of CBA

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Teachers Service Commission versus Kenya National Union of Teachers & Others
  • Moses O Sigu versus Royal Garments Industries EPZ Limited
  • KUCFAW versus Corn Products Kenya Limited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case