SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Catherine Misikhu Khatimba v Mt. Elgon Orchards Limited [2017] KEELRC 1408 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1408 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1408
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1408 (KLR)
Decided
30 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeUnfair TerminationPostureAppeal from original trialCoramMAUREEN ONYANGO
Holding

The court found the termination of the claimant's employment to be unfair and awarded her compensation for unfair termination in the sum of Shs.145,220 based on a salary of Shs.36,305 in her payslip for the month of February 2012.

Facts

The Claimant, Catherine Misikhu Khatimba, alleged that her contract of employment was unfairly terminated by the Respondent, Mt. Elgon Orchards Limited, on 23rd March, 2012. The Respondent claimed the termination was due to undesirable behavior, while the Claimant argued it was due to sexual harassment.

Issues

  1. Whether the termination of the claimant's contract was fair
  2. Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for the unexpired term of her contract

Reasoning

The court determined that there was no valid reason or a hearing in terms of section 43 and 41 of the Employment Act, leading to an unfair termination. The court awarded compensation instead of the unexpired term of the contract.

Outcome

The claimant was awarded compensation for unfair termination.

Orders

  • Award of compensation in the sum of Shs.145,220

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (2)
  • ABRAHAM GUMBA v KENYA MEDICAL SUPPLIES AUTHORITY [2014]eKLR
  • EXPRESS CONNECTIONS LIMITED v EZEKIEL KIARIE KAMANDE
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case