SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John David Omanyala v Santram Hardware Limited [2017] KEELRC 1467 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1467 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1467
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1467 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's Original Action vs Respondent's DefenseCoramD. K. N. Marete
Holding

The court found that the claimant was not dismissed but abandoned his work on August 11, 2015, and thus, the termination was not wrongful, unfair, or unlawful.

Facts

The claimant, John David Omanyala, was employed by the respondent, Santram Hardware Limited, as a truck driver. He worked diligently for eight months and was promoted to a driver of a higher axle truck. He was summarily dismissed on August 11, 2015, without notice or salary in lieu of notice. He claims wrongful dismissal, salary arrears, and other benefits.

Issues

  1. Whether there was a termination of the employment of the claimant by the respondent.
  2. Whether the termination was wrongful, unfair, and unlawful.
  3. Whether the claimant is entitled to the relief sought.
  4. Whether the respondent is entitled to the counter-claim.
  5. Who bears the costs of the cause.

Reasoning

The court relied on Section 47(5) of the Employment Act 2007, which shifts the burden of proof for unfair termination to the employee, and the respondent's case that the claimant abandoned his work.

Outcome

The claimant's case was dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act 2007
  • Section 47(5) of the Employment Act 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Ann Njoroge vs Topez Petroleum Ltd (2013) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case