SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bakery Confectionery Food Manufacturing Allied Worker Union (K) v Beta Bakers Co. Limited [2017] KEELRC 1866 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1866 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1866
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1866 (KLR)
Decided
3 February 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Relations Conciliation and Mediation Committee (LRCMC) decisionCoramMr
Holding

The court held that the respondent was obliged to collect and remit union dues and to recognize the union.

Facts

The Bakery Confectionery Food Manufacturing Allied Worker Union (K) recruited 128 employees, representing a majority of unionsable employees, and submitted check-off forms for union dues. The respondent, Beta Bakers Co. Limited, refused to sign a Recognition Agreement and deduct union dues.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent was obliged to collect and remit union dues.
  2. Whether the respondent was obliged to recognize the union

Reasoning

The court relied on Section 48(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007, which requires employers to deduct union dues from employees' wages and remit them to the union's account. The respondent's refusal to do so was found to be in violation of the law.

Outcome

The court ordered the respondent to execute the Recognition Agreement with the union and to collect and remit union dues backdated from the date the employees joined the union.

Orders

  • To execute the Recognition Agreement with the union within 14 days.
  • To collect and remit union dues backdated from the date the employees joined the union.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case