SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Engineering Workers Union v Aluminium Kenya Limited [2017] KEELRC 947 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 947 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
947
Citation
[2017] KEELRC 947 (KLR)
Decided
20 July 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour DisputePostureAppeal from a Labour Relations Court decisionCoramHonourable Court
Holding

The Court found in favor of the Kenya Engineering Workers Union, stating that the Respondent has not complied with the conditions required by Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 and that the Union has fulfilled the conditions required by Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007.

Facts

The Kenya Engineering Workers Union filed a motion seeking interim orders against Aluminium Kenya Limited to deduct and remit union dues from employees who joined the union. The Respondent had not complied with Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007.

Issues

  1. Whether the Labour Relations Act 2007 requires Aluminium Kenya Limited to deduct and remit union dues from employees who joined the union.
  2. Whether Aluminium Kenya Limited has complied with the conditions required by Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007.

Reasoning

The Court ruled that the Respondent must comply with the conditions required by Section 48 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 and must deduct and remit union dues from employees who joined the union.

Outcome

In favor of the Kenya Engineering Workers Union

Orders

  • The Court ordered Aluminium Kenya Limited to commence deduction of union dues from its employees who have joined the union and remit the same to the Union

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case