SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Joseph Mutua Mtinda v Nine One One Kenya Limited [2019] KEELRC 1404 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 1404 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1404
Citation
[2019] KEELRC 1404 (KLR)
Decided
14 June 2019
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeUnfair DismissalPostureClaimant's AppealCoramJames Rika
The Court declared that the Claimant was constructively dismissed and ordered the Respondent to pay notice pay, annual leave pay, service pay, and gratuity.

Facts

The Claimant, Joseph Mutua Mtinda, was employed by the Respondent, Nine One One Kenya Limited, as a Security Supervisor from 2003 to 2017. The Respondent terminated the Claimant's contract without notice and justifiable cause, and the Claimant is seeking compensation for unfair termination.

Issues

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Notice pay
  • Annual leave pay
  • Service pay
  • Gratuity

Reasoning

The Court found that the termination was unfair and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant notice pay, annual leave pay, service pay, and gratuity.

Outcome

Claimant's appeal successful

Orders

  • Notice pay at Kshs. 15,000
  • Annual leave pay at Kshs. 145,385
  • Service pay at Kshs. 103,860
  • Gratuity at Kshs. 124,632

Remedies

  • Notice pay
  • Annual leave pay
  • Service pay
  • Gratuity

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Regulation of Wages [Protective Services] Order 1998
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case