SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Dorothy Muthoni Ikiara v Kenya National Union of Teachers [2022] KEELRC 201 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 201 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
201
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 201 (KLR)
Decided
27 April 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePostureClaimant vs RespondentCoramMAUREEN ONYANGO
Holding

This Court enters judgment in favor of the Claimant for the remaining Kshs.8,682,878.10 of her terminal dues.

Facts

Claimant Dorothy Muthoni Ikiara was issued a six-month notice of retirement on 19 February 2019 due to attaining mandatory retirement age. She was informed of her terminal dues totaling Kshs.12,132,878.10, which she received partially.

Issues

  1. Claimant's entitlement to the remaining Kshs.8,682,878.10 of her terminal dues
  2. Respondent's justification for not settling the entire amount

Reasoning

The Court agrees with the Respondent that the Claimant has admitted to receiving part of the sum claimed, making it logical to award the remaining amount.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the Claimant for the remaining Kshs.8,682,878.10 of her terminal dues.

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the Claimant for the remaining Kshs.8,682,878.10 of her terminal dues
  • Award of costs of the suit
  • Interest to accrue from the date of filing the claim at Court rates until settlement in full

Remedies

  • Payment of the remaining Kshs.8,682,878.10 of her terminal dues
  • Award of costs of the suit
  • Interest to accrue from the date of filing the claim at Court rates until settlement in full

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case