SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mwanyika v Kenya Wildlife Service (Cause E486 of 2021) [2022] KEELRC 4090 (KLR) (4 April 2022) (Judgment)

[2022] KEELRC 4090 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
4090
Citation
[2022] KEELRC 4090 (KLR)
Decided
4 April 2022
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramM MBARŨ, J
Holding

The suspension and termination were upheld as justified under the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act and the Leadership and Integrity Act.

Facts

The claimant, a female, was offered employment as Head of Corporate Communications by the respondent, a State Corporation. She was placed under probation and suspended on January 20, 2021, and her employment was terminated on May 11, 2021. The claimant alleged unfair, irregular, and unlawful suspension and termination.

Issues

  1. Fairness of the suspension and termination
  2. Constitutional rights violation
  3. Loss of terminal dues

Reasoning

The court found that the suspension was based on the claimant's failure to disclose a pending criminal case in Mombasa, as required by the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act. The termination was also justified as the claimant was found to have failed to disclose this information during the probation period.

Outcome

Affirmed

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act
  • Leadership and Integrity Act
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (2)
  • Chrispus Ileli Kunuva v County Government of Kitui & another [2020] eKLR
  • Elizabeth Cherono Kurgat versus Kenya Literature Bureau [2014] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case