SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ndungu v Union of Kenya Civil Servants & another; Registrar of Trade Unions (Interested Party) (Petition E224 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1132 (KLR) (11 May 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 1132 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1132
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1132 (KLR)
Decided
11 May 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypePetitionPostureRespondents challenged the jurisdiction of the court to deal with the matter.CoramL NDOLO
The matter is prematurely before the Court and both the Petition and Notice of Motion are struck out.

Facts

Petitioner sought a declaration that he was entitled to hold office and complete his term as the National Organizing Secretary of the Union of Kenya Civil Servants. He also filed an interlocutory application for interim orders.

Issues

  • Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court
  • Exhaustion of internal dispute resolution mechanisms

Reasoning

The Court found the dispute to be an internal one between the Union and its official, not a constitutional issue. The Petitioner failed to exhaust the internal dispute resolution mechanism provided in the Union Constitution.

Outcome

Both the Petition and Notice of Motion are struck out.

Orders

  • Both the Petition and Notice of Motion are struck out.
  • Each party will bear their own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
  • Union Constitution
Cases cited (2)
  • William Odhiambo Ramogi & 3 others v Attorney General & 4 others; Muslims for Human Rights & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2020] eKLR
  • Dhow House Limited v Kenya Power and Lighting Company (Constitutional Petition No E058 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 11840 (KLR)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case