SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wachoro v Ellams Products Limited (Cause 1470 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1180 (KLR) (18 May 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1180 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1180
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1180 (KLR)
Decided
18 May 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramOCHARO
Holding

The separation in employment between the Claimant and the Respondent occurred when the Respondent summarily dismissed the Claimant from employment.

Facts

The Claimant, Gedio M. Wachoro, was employed by the Respondent, Ellams Products Limited. The Claimant alleged that he was suspended indefinitely by the Respondent, while the Respondent claimed he was summarily dismissed for desertion of duty. The Claimant sought a declaration that his suspension was invalid and compensation for lost wages.

Issues

  1. How the separation in employment between the Claimant and the Respondent occurred
  2. Whether the termination was fair
  3. Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court found that the Claimant did not discharge his legal burden under section 47[5] of the Employment Act, and the Respondent made an admission that it discharged the Claimant from employment summarily.

Outcome

The Claimant's claim for reinstatement and payback is abandoned. The Claimant is awarded KShs. 53,306 in terminal dues and KShs. 183,672 in damages for unfair termination.

Orders

  • The Claimant's claim for reinstatement and payback is abandoned.
  • The Claimant is awarded KShs. 53,306 in terminal dues and KShs. 183,672 in damages for unfair termination.

Remedies

  • KShs. 53,306 in terminal dues
  • KShs. 183,672 in damages for unfair termination

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Section 47[5] of the Employment Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Arasa & another v Benard Agencies and Servises [2022] KEELRC 116[KLR]
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case