SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kuria v Tigoni Water Supply Co Ltd (Cause E213 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 1473 (KLR) (8 June 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1473 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1473
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1473 (KLR)
Decided
8 June 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramBOM MANANI
The Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) does not have jurisdiction over the claimant's case as the parties do not have an employment relation.

Facts

The claimant, Gorge Kamau Kuria, was engaged by the respondent, Tigoni Water Supply Co Ltd, as an operations director starting January 1998. He was later promoted to Executive Director in January 2020. The claimant asserts that he was entitled to terminal dues and gratuity for 22 years of service, but the respondent denied the claim.

Issues

  • Whether there was an employment relation between the parties
  • Whether the claimant was treated differently in respect of payment of terminal dues
  • Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs he now claims

Reasoning

The court determined that directors of a company are not employees of the company, and the claimant's case does not fall under the ELRC's jurisdiction.

Outcome

The claimant's case is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Chilliebush v Johnston and Others (JR1234/08) [2010] ZALCJHB 35 (26 January 2010)
  • Rift Valley Water Services Board & 3 others v Asanyo & 2 others (Civil Appeal 60 & 61 of 2015 (Consolidated)) [2022] KECA 778 (KLR)
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case