SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kamuyu v Habitech Consultants Limited (Cause E132 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 1533 (KLR) (15 June 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1533 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1533
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1533 (KLR)
Decided
15 June 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramBOM MANANI
The court found that the termination of the Claimant's contract was not for a lawful cause and was not in accordance with fair procedure.

Facts

The Claimant, Angela Muthoni Kamuyu, was employed as an architect by Habitech Consultants Limited from December 20, 2017. The contract was terminated on August 3, 2021, and the Claimant challenged the legality of the termination.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant's contract of employment was terminated for lawful cause and in accordance with fair procedure.
  • Whether the Respondent's counter-claim is merited.
  • Whether the parties are entitled to the reliefs sought in their respective cases.

Reasoning

The court held that the Respondent did not provide evidence to show that the Claimant was absent from work without lawful cause, and thus the termination was unlawful.

Outcome

The court found in favor of the Claimant and ordered the Respondent to pay compensation.

Orders

  • The Respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the Claimant.

Remedies

  • Compensation for the Claimant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case