SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Owiyo v Repelectric (K) Ltd (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 2400 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1636 (KLR) (6 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1636 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1636
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1636 (KLR)
Decided
6 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureAppeal from original trialCoramAN MWAURE
Holding

The court finds the respondent lawfully terminated the claimant and dismisses his case.

Facts

The claimant, Ochieng Owino, was employed as a technician by Repelectric (K) Ltd. on June 1, 2005. He was terminated on July 13, 2017, without just cause, and was told he was working for a competitor. The claimant alleged he was maliciously and unlawfully terminated. The respondent claimed the claimant was passing trade secrets to a competitor and was grossly negligent.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimant was unlawfully terminated from his employment with the respondent.
  2. Whether the claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The respondent had valid reasons to terminate the claimant, and they attempted to follow the right procedure. However, the claimant's failure to cooperate made it impossible to conduct the disciplinary hearing strictly in accordance with the Employment Act. The court orders the respondent to pay the claimant July 2017 salary and interest, but not service pay.

Outcome

Dismissal of the claimant's case

Orders

  • Order for payment of July 2017 salary and interest
  • No order for service pay

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case