Wanyonyi v E-Momentum Interactive Systems (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 2459 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1824 (KLR) (26 July 2023) (Judgment)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 1824
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 1824 (KLR)
- Decided
- 26 July 2023
Summary at a glance
TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant's claim for reinstatement and other prayers against respondent's denial of termination and prayer for dismissal with costs.CoramAN MWAURE
The claimant proved his case for unfair termination and is entitled to the under listed remedies.
Facts
Claimant was employed as a marketing executive by respondent from September 23, 2013, on a gross salary of Kshs 40,000/- per month. He was put on a 3-month probation. Claimant was terminated without valid reason and unprocedurally, and his NSSF deductions were not remitted.
Issues
- Whether claimant was unlawfully and un procedurally terminated.
- Whether claimant deserves the prayers in his claim.
Reasoning
The respondent failed to demonstrate a valid reason for terminating the claimant's employment and did not put him through a disciplinary process. The court found the termination to be unfair.
Outcome
Judgment in favor of the claimant.
Orders
- Reinstatement not allowed.
- Leave due and not taken no specifics and so is disallowed.
- One month salary in lieu of notice Ksh 40,000/-.
- Refund of statutory deductions not remitted and as there are no specifics the same is disallowed.
- Compensating for unlawful termination @ 3 months x 40,000 = 120,000.
- Total award is kshs 160,000/- plus interest at court rates form date of judgment till full payment.
- Costs follow event and so claimant is awarded costs.
Remedies
- One month salary in lieu of notice Ksh 40,000/-.
- Compensating for unlawful termination @ 3 months x 40,000 = 120,000.
- Total award is kshs 160,000/- plus interest at court rates form date of judgment till full payment.
Authorities cited
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…