SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kimemia v East African Breweries Limited & 2 others (Cause 212 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 1837 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1837 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1837
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1837 (KLR)
Decided
27 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramBOM MANANI
Holding

The Court found that the disciplinary process leading to the termination of the Claimant's contract of service was not lawfully conducted, as it was conducted by entities other than the 1st Respondent (East African Breweries Limited). The Court also found that the disciplinary proceedings were not conducted in accordance with the Employment Act.

Facts

The Claimant, James Kimemia, was employed by East African Breweries Limited and Kenya Breweries Limited as a Process Clerk. He was suspended and later terminated due to an incident of attempted theft at the workplace. The Claimant appealed the termination but was not considered. The Respondents are alleged to be aliate companies.

Issues

  1. Whether the parties had an employment relation and if yes, whether the relation was lawfully terminated.
  2. Whether the parties are entitled to the reliefs that they seek through their respective pleadings.

Reasoning

The Court determined that the disciplinary process was not conducted by the 1st Respondent and that the disciplinary proceedings were not conducted in accordance with the Employment Act, thus rendering the termination decision invalid.

Outcome

The Court found the termination decision invalid and ordered the reinstatement of the Claimant's contract of service.

Orders

  • Reinstatement of the Claimant's contract of service

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of the Claimant's contract of service

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case