SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lavington Security Guards Limited v Orege (Appeal E018 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1906 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 1906 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1906
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1906 (KLR)
Decided
27 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks stay of execution of a judgment and costsCoramCN BAARI
Holding

An order for stay of execution of the judgment is granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Facts

The Appellant/Applicant seeks a stay of execution of a judgment rendered by the Magistrates Court on March 16, 2023, and costs. The Respondent is the successful litigant in the matter.

Issues

  1. Whether the Appellant/Applicant will suffer substantial and irreparable loss if the orders are not granted.
  2. Whether the Respondent can refund the decretal sum if the Appellant/Applicant’s appeal succeeds.

Reasoning

The Appellant/Applicant has met the conditions set out under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, having established sufficient cause, shown substantial loss, and furnished security.

Outcome

The Appellant/Applicant’s motion for stay of execution is granted.

Orders

  • Order for stay of execution of the judgment delivered on March 16, 2023, in this matter is hereby granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Remedies

  • The costs of this application shall abide the appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Wilson v Church (No 2) 12 Ch D (1879) 454
  • Century Oil Trading Company Ltd vs Kenya Shell Limited Nairobi (Milimani) HCMCA No 1561 of 2007
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case