SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Karuma v Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Limited (Cause E023 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR) (13 July 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1920
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureRespondent's Notice of Preliminary ObjectionsCoramM MBARŨ
Holding

The court dismisses the claim with costs, finding the claim time-barred and without jurisdiction.

Facts

Claimant was employed by Respondent from 1989 until February 4, 2020, when he was summarily dismissed. He filed suit on March 23, 2023, more than 3 years after the cause of action arose.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the claim due to time-barred nature of the employment dispute.
  2. Whether the claimant's employment was terminated by summary dismissal and if so, whether the claimant's suit is timely filed.

Reasoning

The claim is time-barred as it was filed more than 3 years after the cause of action arose, and the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the claim due to the time-barred nature.

Outcome

Claim dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 2007
  • Public Authorities Limitations Act
Cases cited (8)
  • Joel Kiprono Langat v Kenya Posts & Telecommunications Corporation
  • Nyabuto Arambe Abusa v Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Limited
  • Attorney General & another v Andrew Maina Githinji & another
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 others
  • Kibe v Attorney General (Civil Appeal No 164 of 2000)
  • Beatrice Kahai Adagala v Postal Corporation of Kenya
  • Divecon Limited v Samani
  • Josephat Ndirangu v Henkel Chemicals (EA) Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case