SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Union of Water and Sewerage Employees v Tana and Athi Rivers Development Authority; Union of Kenya Civil Servants (Interested Party) (Cause E288 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 1929 (KLR) (31 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 1929 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
1929
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1929 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabour Relations DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramMA ONYANGO
Holding

The Recognition Agreement is valid and the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Facts

The Kenya Union of Water and Sewerage Employees (Claimant) and Tana and Athi Rivers Development Authority (Respondent) have a valid Recognition Agreement and a running Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The Respondent stopped the Claimant's monthly union dues through an internal memo dated March 26, 2021.

Issues

  1. Whether there exists a valid Recognition Agreement between the Claimant and the Respondent
  2. If the Recognition Agreement is valid, whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court finds that the Recognition Agreement is valid and the CBA is not yet terminated. The Respondent's action of stopping the union dues is found to be dictatorial and in violation of the laid down procedure.

Outcome

The court declares that the action and inaction by the Respondent on the matter is dictatorial and invalidates the Respondent's decision to stop the deduction and remittance of union dues.

Orders

  • A declaration that the action and inaction by the Respondent on the matter is dictatorial and invalidates the Respondent's decision to stop the deduction and remittance of union dues

Remedies

  • The Respondent is ordered to resume the deduction and remittance of union dues

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Labour Relations Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case