Ouma v Bonito Hotels Limited t/a Tourist Hotel Bungoma & 2 others (Cause 4 of 2019) [2023] KEELRC 20 (KLR) (19 January 2023) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 20
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 20 (KLR)
- Decided
- 19 January 2023
The court granted the application for a stay of execution of the warrant of attachment, finding that the objectors had a legal entitlement to the vehicles and that the judgment debtor did not respond to the objection notice.
Facts
The objectors, Bob Nyakwara Ariemba and George Ambrose Njuba, claimed to be the registered owners of motor vehicles KCR 185M and KCH 346V, which were proclaimed by the judgment debtor, Bonito Hotels Limited, for sale to realize a court decree. The objectors argued they were not agents of the judgment debtor and that the vehicles belonged to them.
Issues
- Legal entitlement to the proclaimed motor vehicles
- Proper procedure for objection to attachment
Reasoning
The court applied the principles from Chotabhae M. Patel v Chapraphi Patel, holding that the objectors must prove they had interests in the property at the time of attachment. The court found the objectors' legal entitlement to the vehicles and that the judgment debtor did not respond to the objection notice.
Outcome
Application granted
Orders
- Stay of execution of warrant of attachment
Remedies
- Stay of execution of warrant of attachment
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Civil Procedure Act
- Civil Procedure Rules 2010
Cases cited (2)
- Arun C. Sharma v Ashana Raikundalia T/A A. Raikundalia & Co. Advocates & 4 Others (2014)eKLR
- Chotabhae M. Patel v Chapraphi Patel {1958} Ed 743
Loading judgment…