SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Keiza v Rift Valley Railways (K) Limited & another (Cause 565 of 2015) [2023] KEELRC 2018 (KLR) (31 July 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2018 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2018
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2018 (KLR)
Decided
31 July 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Labour Relations CourtCoramSTELLA RUTTO
Holding

The Claimant was an employee of the 1st Respondent at the time of her termination. The termination was unfair and unlawful.

Facts

Violet Yakama Keiza was employed by Kenya Railways Corporation and later transferred to Rift Valley Railways (K) Limited. She was dismissed on August 30, 2012, for alleged involvement in a fraudulent transaction involving LPO No 9850.

Issues

  1. Who was the Claimant’s employer at the time of her termination?
  2. Whether the Claimant’s termination from employment was unfair and unlawful?
  3. Is the Claimant entitled to the reliefs sought?

Reasoning

The Court found that the 1st Respondent terminated the Claimant's employment without valid reasons and procedurally. The 1st Respondent failed to prove the reason for termination and did not provide a fair hearing.

Outcome

The Court ordered the 1st Respondent to pay the Claimant Kshs 290,381.00 in compensation.

Orders

  • Award of compensation in the sum of Kshs 290,381.00

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs 290,381.00

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (1)
  • Kenneth Nyaga Mwige vs. Austin Kiguta & 2 others [2015] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case