Keiser v Makupa Transit Shade Limited (Cause 47 of 2020) [2023] KEELRC 2030 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 2030
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 2030 (KLR)
- Decided
- 27 July 2023
Summary at a glance
TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramM. MBARŨ
The court finds that the respondent was served with the necessary notices and has not been prejudiced. The respondent's application is dismissed.
Facts
The claimant, Dennis Keiser, sought a judgment against Makupa Transit Shade Limited. The respondent, Makupa Transit Shade Limited, filed an application seeking to review the court's previous orders and have the matter re-opened and heard afresh.
Issues
- Service of notices
- Admissibility of evidence
Reasoning
The court ruled that the respondent was properly served and that the claimant had discharged his duty to serve the respondent. The court dismissed the respondent's application as it did not serve justice to go back and forth on the matter.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The respondent will meet the costs up to this point
- The Deputy Registrar will assess these costs and pay them by the respondent before hearing is reopened
- The process shall be completed in the next 30 days
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Loading judgment…