SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kisongochi v Fortcom Holdings Ltd (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 2337 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 2069 (KLR) (9 August 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2069 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2069
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2069 (KLR)
Decided
9 August 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureRespondent's application for stay of execution dismissedCoramAN MWAURE
The respondent's application for stay of execution is dismissed with costs

Facts

The case was filed on 22nd November 2017 and set for hearing on 21st March 2022. The respondent and his advocate did not appear for the hearing and did not participate in the proceedings.

Issues

  • Whether the applicant has demonstrated a credible case for grant of stay of execution
  • Whether the respondent has established substantial loss and arguable issues for an appeal

Reasoning

The court found the respondent and his advocate to be indolent and unprofessional, and did not demonstrate a credible case for grant of stay of execution. The respondent also failed to establish substantial loss and arguable issues for an appeal.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for stay of execution dismissed

Remedies

  • Claimant's costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Alice Mumbi Nyanga v Danson Chege Nyanga & Another Civil case No 394 of 2001
  • Global Tours & Travels Ltd WC NO 43 of 200 UR
  • Court of Appeal of Vishram Raiji Halai v Thornton & Turpin Civil Application No 15 of 1991 (1990) eKLR 365
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case