SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Cerapack Products Limited v Kamuya (Appeal E020 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 2090 (KLR) (19 June 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2090 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2090
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2090 (KLR)
Decided
19 June 2023
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppellant seeks stay of execution pending appealCoramOCHARO
The Court denied the stay of execution pending appeal as the Appellant did not demonstrate substantial loss and did not provide security for the due performance of the decree.

Facts

Appellant, Cerapack Products Limited, appealed against a judgment in a civil case. The Respondent, Lucia Wayua Kamuya, had executed a judgment by declaring the Appellant's goods for attachment. The Appellant sought a stay of execution to preserve the appeal.

Issues

  • Whether the Appellant has met the prerequisites for a grant of stay of execution pending appeal

Reasoning

The Court applied the principles for a grant of stay of execution pending appeal, emphasizing that the Applicant must demonstrate substantial loss and provide security. The Appellant failed to meet these requirements.

Outcome

The Court denied the application for stay of execution pending appeal.

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution pending appeal was denied.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Butt v. Rent Restriction Tribunal (1979) E.A.
  • Shell Limited vs. Kibiru and another (1986) KRR 410
  • Arun C. Sharma vs. Ashana Raikurdalia c/a Rairundalia & Co. Advocates & 2 others (2014) eKLR
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case