SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wanyama v H Young & Co (East Africa) Limited & another (Miscellaneous Cause E121 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2183 (KLR) (21 September 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEELRC 2183 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2183
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2183 (KLR)
Decided
21 September 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous CausePostureAppeal from a previous rulingCoramMA ONYANGO
Holding

The application succeeds in terms of prayers 1 and 2, and the court orders the 1st and 2nd Respondents to jointly and severally pay the applicant Ksh.1,229,011.20 in compensation.

Facts

The applicant, Premas Wafula Wanyama, sought compensation for work injury claims under the Work Injury Benefits Act, but the 1st and 2nd Respondents (Jubilee Insurance Co Limited and H Young & Co (East Africa) Limited) argued that the applicant was not a party to the contract and that the 1st Respondent had not complied with the terms of the contract.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is a party to the contract with the 1st Respondent
  2. Whether the 1st Respondent is obligated to pay compensation

Reasoning

The court ruled that the applicant is not a party to the contract, but the 1st Respondent is obligated to pay compensation either from the employer or the insurer due to statutory exemptions.

Outcome

The application is successful, and the 1st and 2nd Respondents are ordered to pay compensation.

Orders

  • The assessment of the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services is adopted as a judgment of this court.
  • Judgment be and is hereby entered for the Applicant against the Respondents jointly and severally in the sum of Ksh.1,229,011.20.
  • The respondents shall jointly and severally pay the Applicants costs.

Remedies

  • Compensation of Ksh.1,229,011.20

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Work Injury Benefits Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case