SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Atisiaya v National Social Security Fund & another (Petition E208 of 2022) [2023] KEELRC 2212 (KLR) (25 September 2023) (Judgment)

[2023] KEELRC 2212 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
2212
Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2212 (KLR)
Decided
25 September 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPosturePetition for conservatory ordersCoramJK GAKERI
Holding

The court finds that the petitioner's right to human dignity was violated by the withholding of his salary, and that his right to fair hearing and administration of justice was violated by the retirement decision.

Facts

Petitioner Julius Miheso Atisiaya was employed by the Office of the Auditor General and later transferred to the National Social Security Fund. He claims his date of birth was incorrectly recorded on his identity card, leading to his retirement at the age of 58.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioner's right to be treated with dignity was violated by withholding his salary.
  2. Whether the National Social Security Fund was justifiably retiring the petitioner.
  3. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The court held that the withholding of salary was degrading and inhumane, and that the retirement decision was not made through a fair process.

Outcome

The court declared that the petitioner's right to human dignity was violated and ordered the 1st Respondent to pay the petitioner's salary for the month of November 2022.

Orders

  • Order for the 1st Respondent to pay the petitioner's salary for the month of November 2022.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Civil Procedure Act (Chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)
Cases cited (1)
  • Jonathan Spangler v Centre for African Family Studies (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case